Rubric for Evaluation for Hand outs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tasks
|
Exemplary
4
|
Superior
3
|
Satisfactory
2
|
Unsatisfactory
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Observation/
Documentation:
|
All
tasks were done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectations
|
All
or nearly all tasks were done with high quality
|
Nearly
all tasks were done with acceptable quality
|
Fewer
than half of tasks were done; or most objectives met but with poor quality
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
My
analysis
|
Analysis
questions were answered completely; in depth answers; thoroughly grounded on
theories
Exemplary
grammar and spelling.
|
Analysis
questions were answered completely. Clear connection with theories. Grammar
and spelling are superior.
|
Analysis
questions were not answered completely. Vaguely related to the theories.
Grammar and spelling acceptable.
|
Analysis
question not answered. Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
My
Reflection
|
Reflection
statements are profound and clear, supported by experiences from the episode.
|
Reflection
statements are clear, but not clearly supported by experiences from the
episode.
|
Reflection
statements are shallow; supported by experiences from the episode.
|
Reflection
statement are unclear and shallow and are not supported by experiences from
the episode
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
My
collections
|
Portfolio
is complete, clear, well-organized and all supporting documentation are
located in section clearly designated
|
Portfolio
is complete, clear, well organized and most supporting documentation are
available and/or in logical and clearly marked location
|
Portfolio
is incomplete; supporting documentation is organized but is lacking
|
Portfolio
has many lacking components, is unorganized and unclear.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submission
|
Ahead
the deadline
|
On
the deadline
|
A
day after the deadline
|
Two
day or more after the deadline
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]()
Over-all
Score
|
![]() ![]()
(based
on
Transmutation)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
___________________________
_____________________________
Signature of FS Teacher Date
Above Printed Name
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transmutation
of score to grade/ rating:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source:
Field Study 3 by Maria Rita D. Lucas
|
Linggo, Pebrero 3, 2013
Rubric for Evaluation of Handouts
Mag-subscribe sa:
I-post ang Mga Komento (Atom)
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento