Rubrics for Evaluation for Handouts

Field Study 3, Episode 1- The Schools’ Learning Resource Center Focused on: Identifying and classifying resources that facilitate teaching and learning processes
Tasks	Exemplary 4	Superior 3		Satisfactory 2	Unsatisfactory 1
Observation/ Documentation:	All tasks were done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectations	All or nearly all tasks were done with high quality		Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality	Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objectives met but with poor quality
	4	3		2	1
My analysis	Analysis questions were answered completely; in depth answers; thoroughly grounded on theories Exemplary grammar and spelling.	Analysis questions were answered completely. Clear connection with theories. Grammar and spelling are superior.		Analysis questions were not answered completely. Vaguely related to the theories. Grammar and spelling acceptable.	Analysis question not answered. Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory
	4	3		2	1
My Reflection	Reflection statements are profound and clear, supported by experiences from the episode.	Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly supported by experiences from the episode.		Reflection statements are shallow; supported by experiences from the episode.	Reflection statement are unclear and shallow and are not supported by experiences from the episode
	4	3		2	1
My collections	Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and all supporting documentation are located in section clearly designated	Portfolio is complete, clear, well organized and most supporting documentation are available and/or in logical and clearly marked location		Portfolio is incomplete; supporting documentation is organized but is lacking	Portfolio has many lacking components, is unorganized and unclear.
	4	3		2	1
Submission	Ahead the deadline	On the deadline		A day after the deadline	Two day or more after the deadline
	4	3		2	1
Sub Total
Over-all Score			Rating (based on Transmutation)
___________________________                                                                _____________________________               Signature of FS Teacher                                                                                        Date               Above Printed Name
Transmutation of score to grade/ rating: score Grade Score Grade 20 1.0 99 12-13 2.50 81 18-19  1.25 96 11 2.75 78 17 1.5 93 10 3.0 75 16 1.75 90 8-9 3.5 72 15 2.00 87 7 below 5.00 70 14 2.25 84
Source: Field Study 3 by Maria Rita D. Lucas

Rubric for Evaluation of Handouts

Rubric for Evaluation for Hand outs
Tasks	Exemplary 4	Superior 3		Satisfactory 2	Unsatisfactory 1
Observation/ Documentation:	All tasks were done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectations	All or nearly all tasks were done with high quality		Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality	Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objectives met but with poor quality
	4	3		2	1
My analysis	Analysis questions were answered completely; in depth answers; thoroughly grounded on theories Exemplary grammar and spelling.	Analysis questions were answered completely. Clear connection with theories. Grammar and spelling are superior.		Analysis questions were not answered completely. Vaguely related to the theories. Grammar and spelling acceptable.	Analysis question not answered. Grammar and spelling unsatisfactory
	4	3		2	1
My Reflection	Reflection statements are profound and clear, supported by experiences from the episode.	Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly supported by experiences from the episode.		Reflection statements are shallow; supported by experiences from the episode.	Reflection statement are unclear and shallow and are not supported by experiences from the episode
	4	3		2	1
My collections	Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and all supporting documentation are located in section clearly designated	Portfolio is complete, clear, well organized and most supporting documentation are available and/or in logical and clearly marked location		Portfolio is incomplete; supporting documentation is organized but is lacking	Portfolio has many lacking components, is unorganized and unclear.
	4	3		2	1
Submission	Ahead the deadline	On the deadline		A day after the deadline	Two day or more after the deadline
	4	3		2	1
Sub Total
Over-all Score			Rating (based on Transmutation)
___________________________                                                                _____________________________               Signature of FS Teacher                                                                                        Date               Above Printed Name
Transmutation of score to grade/ rating: score Grade Score Grade 20 1.0 99 12-13 2.50 81 18-19  1.25 96 11 2.75 78 17 1.5 93 10 3.0 75 16 1.75 90 8-9 3.5 72 15 2.00 87 7 below 5.00 70 14 2.25 84
Source: Field Study 3 by Maria Rita D. Lucas